Wonder Flavors Soft Candy reviewed by SessionDrummer

submitted about 3 years ago by Session-Drummer

Thanks out to u/wllmc from Bull City Flavors for sending these out for review.

All tested on the SteamCrave RTDA v.1 with dual vertical Kanthal, 24ga. coils @ 65 watts.

Soft Candy (Base) (WF) 3.5% (4-3-22) – You never know what you’re going to get with a “base”, and sometimes, well, they’re “basic” LOL. This one however, was quite an interesting one. About two ticks above mid-level sweet, and actually very candy-like, it did indeed have an almost “smoothness” to it. You could say marshamalow-ish, BUT not a marshmallow. Overall it did portray a very neutral “base”, but it FELT like there might just be a smidge of fruit, or vanilla in there, but it was WELL hidden, leaving it nicely IN the “base camp”, pun intended. Plenty present as a “candy” at this weight. Soft MAY imply taffy to many of you, and I didn’t really get any taffy from it, so let’s just leave it at “soft”. Even with above mid level sweet, it did not have the “sugar lips” effect, and there was a slight tartness to it, just on the end, that kept it more than basic. I’ll be reviewing Wonder Flavors Soft Candy Strawberry next, so I am fairly sure, THIS one is in it. All in, with nothing out of place, or off-putting and with a convincing candy like presentation, this one worked, for what it was. I COULD see topping this off with numerous fruits, and pulling it in any direction needed, as it’s neutrality would easily allow that. Easily placing this one @ 8.5/10.

https://www.bullcityflavors.com/wonder-flavors-sample-pack/

https://forum.e-liquid-recipes.com/t/wonder-flavors-wf-part-ii-single-flavor-tests-by-sessiondrummer-mixing-now/263020?u=sessiondrummer

Testing setup and criteria

Comments

1 points

by Kittybit8about 3 years agoI found my thrill on ID10-T’s hill

I'm very intrigued about what this could be. If it's not a marshmallow type nor a taffy type, what the heck is it then.

Seems like an odd flavor to build a soft candy around if it's neither, when we got soooo many other options to exactly make those specific two.

4 points

by Session-Drummerabout 3 years ago

>I'm very intrigued about what this could be. If it's not a marshmallow type nor a taffy type, what the heck is it then.

Agreed u/Kittybit8, as it was kind of hard to quantify. I've had countless questions if it was a Starburst Candy, and the Base, not exactly. It could be PULLED into one, but as it stood, I wouldn't say it screamed Starburst, but the "soft" is what might be the key.